🔗 Share this article ‘It’s heartbreaking’: how thirty captive white whales are now pawns in conflict over animal welfare. Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie Botts is an charming small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a large but fiercely protective companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “most affectionate” with a heart of gold. A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based amusement park have become pawns in a disagreement between a closed attraction, local and national governments and advocacy groups. But those closest to the whales say the intense debate over their future often overlooks the nuances of the whales who, after living their entire lives in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who interact with them daily. After the Canadian government blocked the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled attraction near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to end their lives unless the federal government covers the cost of their survival. The nation’s fisheries minister has denied that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position. Intelligent Marine Mammals Experts say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, problem solving and communal behavior point to they are highly cognitive creatures – something one caretaker learned directly. Burgess spent a significant period as a whale caretaker, a role that involved gaining confidence of the sea creatures. “Developing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.” The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was even so amazed by the nuances and unique traits in their dispositions. She developed a deep bond for a pair of whales with different temperaments. “One whale accepted me. Cleo required effort,” she said. “Each changed the way I understand connection.” Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions Her relationship with the whales evolved against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their confinement. During her tenure at the attraction, seven belugas and the park’s one orca, Kiska, died. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the park attributes to natural mortality, but which activists say reflects the poor conditions in which they were kept. The park did not open to the public over the summer, but the former trainer says she observed directly effects of the cessation. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the pools because they’re falling apart and not being maintained. The whales are exploratory and so they pick it up and navigate with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.” The facility did not reply to a inquiry, but previously claimed: “The whales … get far higher quality health care and constant care than any person in the Britain, or anywhere else.” Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions The former employee was terminated from the facility in recent months following the death of a beluga, an unwell beluga the employees had to put down. She said the park thought details of the incident were leaked to the press and she was fired soon after. The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and other caretakers in despair. She says the park’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “logistically impossible” undertaking, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “significant manpower”, equipment and machinery. “There’s no way in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said. She backs calls for the whales to be transferred immediately from the park, with its failing enclosures and reduced personnel. In the autumn, Canada’s government official rejected a bid to export the whales to China. “Allowing the proposal would have meant a perpetual life in enclosure and a reversion to performance for audiences,” the minister wrote. “As Canadians, we know that belugas belong in the ocean, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in clear conscience authorize an relocation that would continue the treatment these belugas have suffered.” But the former trainer said the minister’s statements reveal a wider misunderstanding of the circumstances of life for belugas born in captivity. “The public needs to grasp these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.” Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion As authorities struggle to find a answer, ideas have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of northern regions – where whales are a key source of sustenance for local populations. A proposed protected area in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received regulatory clearance, has shown to be highly debated. The future location, which includes extensive space of protected cove, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a sustainable answer for a number of the whales. But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s discussed with, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being. Others say the possibility of a sanctuary indicates a worldwide trend away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a viable plan in the coming months. The project lead, head of the sanctuary project, said the location will mimic the mental engagement and diet the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a much larger space. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|