🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.